Recovery of Graphite from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries for Use in Conductive Ink Preparation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62239/jca.2026.006Keywords:
Recycled graphite, Lithium-ion battery, Conductive ink, PVP, Thermal treatment, Electrical conductivity, Response Surface Methodology (RSM)Abstract
This study presents a cost-effective and environmentally friendly approach for recovering graphite from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and reusing it as a precursor for the preparation of flexible conductive inks. Graphite was recovered from the anode through a mechanical separation process, followed by chemical purification using 1 M HCl to remove residual metal ions (Li, Co, Ni), and subsequent thermal treatment at 1000 °C in an inert atmosphere to eliminate organic binders (PVDF) and partially restore the defective crystalline structure caused by charge/discharge cycling. The purified graphite exhibited a high carbon purity (> 93.4 %) and was used to formulate conductive inks with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) as the polymer binder and carbon black (CB) as a conductivity enhancer. The optimal ink composition was determined using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The optimized ink showed good electrical conductivity (surface resistance ≈ 415 Ω/cm) and excellent mechanical flexibility, maintaining stable conductivity under a bending radius of 0.5 cm. These results provide a sustainable solution for waste battery management and contribute to the advancement of low-cost printed electronics technology.
Downloads
References
M. Abdollahifar, S.S. Huang, Y.H. Lin, Y.C. Lin, B.Y. Jheng, M.H. Tu, Y.S. Wu, N.L. Wu, Adv. Mater. Technol., 8(2) (2023) 2200368. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202200368
N. Cao, Y.L. Zhang, L.L. Chen, J. Power Sources, 483 (2021) 229163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229163
T.C. de Oliveira Cândido, A.C. Pereira, D.N. da Silva, Analytica, 4(4) (2023) 513-526. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytica4040035
E. Fan, L. Li, Z. Wang, J. Lin, Y. Huang, Y. Yao, R. Chen, F. Wu, Chem. Rev., 120(14) (2020) 7020-7063. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00535
Y. Gao, C. Zhu, T. Chen, X. Yan, M. Chen, S. Cao, W. Hu, D. Xu, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 8(25) (2020) 9444-9455. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c02321
Y.Z.N. Htwe, M. Mariatti, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 125 (2021) 402-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.06.022
D.S. Kim, J.M. Jeong, H.J. Park, Nano-Micro Lett., 13 (2021) 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00617-3
M. Lehmann, C.G. Kolb, F. Klinger, M.F. Zäh, Mater. Des., 207 (2021) 109871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109871
F. Liu, S. Ni, C. Shen, X. Chen, J. Peng, D. Fu, J. Xu, Prog. Org. Coat., 133 (2019) 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.04.043
J. Liu, H. Shi, X. Hu, Sci. Total Environ., 816 (2022) 151621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151621
M. Shi, G. Wang, C. Sun, J. Yang, S. Liu, T. Fang, C. Xu, Q. Zhu, Fuel, 292 (2021) 120250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120250
T.S. Tran, N.K. Dutta, N.R. Choudhury, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 261 (2018) 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2018.10.010
S.D. Widijatmoko, G. Fu, Z. Wang, P. Hall, Sustainable Mater. Technol., 23 (2020) e00134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00134
Y. Yang, X. Meng, Z. Cao, W. Lin, Y. Liu, Y. Sun, Y. Pu, J. Zhan, J. Fang, J. Zhang, Waste Manage., 85 (2019) 529-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.008
C. Yi, K. Yang, S. Cheng, J. Zhang, L. He, J. Hu, J. Cleaner Prod., 277 (2020) 123585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123585
B. Zhang, Y. Xu, D.S. Silvester, C.E. Banks, L. Ji, H. Gong, J. Power Sources, 589 (2024) 233728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233728
Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, S. Zheng, Z.S. Wu, J. Energy Chem., 63 (2021) 498-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.08.011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Thanh Binh, Nguyen Thi Mo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Share
Funding data
-
Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
Grant numbers QG.25.18









